Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.0 to 16.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 42.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.