Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 17.0.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1487 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1483 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1474 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.