Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen1.5-110B
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 38.1.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 33.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1168 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1185 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1144 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1150 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1141 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1158 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen1.5-110B?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen1.5-110B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.