Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 17.0.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderBaiduMoonshot AI
Noometry Index41.843.3
Released—2026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked2019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1455—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1437—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1428—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1512—
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1445—
LMArena Creative Writing1426—
LMArena Multi-Turn1434—

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 42.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper