Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Mercury 2
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.0 to 33.5.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Mercury 2 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1362 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1329 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1330 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Mercury 2?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Mercury 2 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Mercury 2 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.