Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 79.9% for Grok 4.5.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 55.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1474 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1553 |
| SciCode | — | 54.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 46.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,309 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |
Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 79.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1462 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 36% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.92 |
Math Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 24.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1466 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.3% |
Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | 1288 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1496 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1448 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1450 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1446 |
Long Context Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1442 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 4.5?
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?
Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 4.5 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.