Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3 leads 46.1 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 74.2% for GLM-5.3.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.854.8
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked2042

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Coding14551496
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
ALE-Bench—1,317

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%74.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451489
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.61

Math GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Math14371489
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Expert14281516
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GLM-5.3: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English14361457
LMArena Chinese15121528
LMArena French14671499
LMArena German14601499
LMArena Japanese13821453
LMArena Korean14061472
LMArena Russian14461463
LMArena Spanish14731460

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following14131477

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query14221482

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3
LMArena Text14451471
LMArena Creative Writing14261457
LMArena Multi-Turn14341472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-5.3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper