Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

54.6

Rank #30 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.6 Luna in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 77.7 to 39.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 69.4% for GPT-5.6 Luna.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderBaiduOpenAI
Noometry Index41.854.6
Released—2026-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2052

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GPT-5.6 Luna: 54.5 (#28)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Coding14551466
DeepSWE—67.2%
FrontierCode—39.8%
CursorBench—35.9%
LMArena WebDev—1519
SciCode—53.6%
WeirdML—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,667

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GPT-5.6 Luna: 34.4 (#45)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
APEX-Agents—43%
BALROG—45.6%
GDP.pdf—22.7%
Vending-Bench 2—4,095

Reasoning GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GPT-5.6 Luna: 47.6 (#43)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%69.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451451
ARC-AGI-2—59.5%
SimpleBench—46.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
ARC-AGI-1—88%
CritPt—20.6%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—21%
DTBench—89.1%
LMCA—48.5%
Surface Evolver Bench—61.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.39

Math GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GPT-5.6 Luna: 77.7 (#14)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Math14371458
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—82.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4—61%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.3%
ProofBench—60%

Knowledge GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GPT-5.6 Luna: 58.5 (#34)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Expert14281478
GPQA Diamond—91.6%
SimpleQA Verified—41%

Multimodal GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GPT-5.6 Luna: 42.7 (#28)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Vision12491258
Blueprint-Bench 2—22.6%
Furniture Assembly—42.5%
LMArena Document—1457

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GPT-5.6 Luna: 52.8 (#78)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Non-English14361417
LMArena Chinese15121470
LMArena French14671456
LMArena German14601454
LMArena Japanese13821411
LMArena Korean14061415
LMArena Russian14461428
LMArena Spanish14731448

Instruction Following GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GPT-5.6 Luna: 75.6 (#57)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following14131437

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GPT-5.6 Luna: 43.9 (#82)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query14221436

Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Luna leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GPT-5.6 Luna: 68.0 (#29)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text14451431
LMArena Creative Writing14261396
LMArena Multi-Turn14341434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1829
EQ-Bench 4—1156

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-5.6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.6 Luna share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Luna has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper