Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

54.6

Rank #29 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 8 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 49.1 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 75.1% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index54.641.8
Released2026-06-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked5120

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Coding14831455
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.7%—
CursorBench34.1%—
LMArena WebDev1541—
SciCode54.3%—
GSO37.3%—
WeirdML68.8%—
ALE-Bench1,463—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), ERNIE 5.0 0110: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
APEX-Agents54.5%—
GBAEval65.3%—
LMArena Search1194—
Vending-Bench 26,378—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
NYT Connections (extended)75.1%10.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14611445
SimpleBench60.6%—
CritPt16.9%—
Chess Puzzles35%—
Thematic Generalization—41.7%
Mystery Game Puzzles35%—
DTBench92.5%—
LMCA50%—
Surface Evolver Bench60%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.21—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Math14671437
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)65.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.7%—
ProofBench77%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Expert14901428
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
SimpleQA Verified33.7%—

Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Vision12741249
Blueprint-Bench 224.9%—
LMArena Document1466—

Multilingual Too close to call

Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Non-English14311436
LMArena Chinese14771512
LMArena French14601467
LMArena German14401460
LMArena Japanese14221382
LMArena Korean14111406
LMArena Russian14511446
LMArena Spanish14371473

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14521413

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Longer Query14631422

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Text14421445
LMArena Creative Writing14161426
LMArena Multi-Turn14541434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1794—
EQ-Bench 41236—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper