Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5.5 Instant
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-5.5 Instant in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 26.1.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1433 |
| SciCode | — | 48.6% |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.2 (#149)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1426 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.48 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1420 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 26.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 68.1% |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#68)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1409 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.5% |
Multimodal Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), GPT-5.5 Instant: 39.3 (#48)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1250 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1403 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), GPT-5.5 Instant: 53.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1428 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1410 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1430 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1407 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#92)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), GPT-5.5 Instant: 62.0 (#81)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1420 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1434 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5.5 Instant?
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-5.5 Instant better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.7 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.5 Instant share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 Instant has 27.