Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
BaiduSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 24.1 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1455 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | 41.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1445 |
Math Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1437 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1428 |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1249 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1473 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1413 |
Long Context Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1434 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.