Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
UpstageSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1416 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Solar Pro4 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.