Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.5 to 15.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1299 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.