Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 38.7 to 23.4.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.