Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

30.1

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 38.7 to 26.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 14.9% for Claude 3 Haiku and 56.1% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.930.1
Released2024-03-072024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%45%
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%52.3%
WeirdML9.8%—
LMArena Coding1199—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35128.52
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%7.4%
MATH Level 514.9%56.1%
LMArena Math1188—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond36.3%46.1%
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper