Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs GPT-5.4 nano

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 nano in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 55.7 to 15.2.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and GPT-5.4 nano specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
ProviderDatabricksOpenAI
Noometry Index25.541.9
Released2023-04-112026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.25
Results tracked1740

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Coding7761405
SciCode—46.9%
WeirdML—49.2%
ALE-Bench—1,005

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Hard Prompts8041381
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67145.81
ARC-AGI-2—5.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—39.7%
ARC-AGI-1—51.5%
CritPt—9.3%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—36.9%
ForecastBench—57.3
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Math8711406
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—87.8%
ProofBench—5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—25.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
GPQA Diamond—78.5%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.1%
LMArena Expert—1396
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Vision—1196

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Non-English8361359
LMArena Chinese8361392
LMArena French—1396
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1343
LMArena Korean—1320
LMArena Russian—1363
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Instruction Following8141362

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Longer Query—1366

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Text8511372
LMArena Creative Writing8641314
LMArena Multi-Turn7401382

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GPT-5.4 nano share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper