Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 49.9 to 38.7.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1005 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1047 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1012 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |
Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 992 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 959 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.