Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 28.3 to 9.2.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | 23.3% |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1005 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.3 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1047 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 970 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3 Haiku leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1011 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | 1108 | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 990 |
| LMArena French | 1194 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1165 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Haiku leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 992 |
Long Context Claude 3 Haiku leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Haiku leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 958 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.