Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Ministral 3B

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Ministral 3B specifications
Seed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
ProviderByteDance SeedMistral AI
Noometry Index43.226.2
Released2026-02-142024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K131K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.10
Results tracked206

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Coding1472—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—
DTBench—51.7%
LMCA—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.1

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Math1439—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Ministral 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1441—
LMArena Chinese1489—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1449—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Ministral 3B?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper