Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 24.1.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderByteDance SeedXiaomi
Noometry Index43.250.3
Released2026-02-142026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.87
Results tracked2019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding14721534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14531512
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—26.6%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math14391494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert14401543

Multimodal Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision12741264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English14411474
LMArena Chinese14891529
LMArena Russian14491480
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14141493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14281501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text14481492
LMArena Creative Writing14061468
LMArena Multi-Turn14411464

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper