Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Llama 2-7B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1002 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1009 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 970 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1006 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 999 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Llama 2-7B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Llama 2-7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.