Model comparison

Grok 4.1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 xAI

41.5

Rank #134 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 39.5.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Grok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderxAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index41.543.3
Released2025-11-172026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev12141473
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1445—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
Cybench39%—
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1435—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1422—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1417—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1425—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1397—
LMArena Korean1407—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1438—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1400—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1416—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1437—
LMArena Creative Writing1411—
LMArena Multi-Turn1437—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.1 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper