Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4.5

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

36.9

Rank #200 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and GPT-4.5 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 23.1 to 14.1.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.5 specifications
Seed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
ProviderByteDance SeedOpenAI
Noometry Index42.536.9
Released2026-02-142025-02-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$3—
Results tracked2042

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Coding14721397
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
WeirdML—39.4%
LiveBench Coding—75.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14531404
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.74
ForecastBench—61.7
LiveBench—69%

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Math14401412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
MATH Level 5—78.6%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Expert14401394
GPQA Diamond—68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%

Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision12751195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English14421413
LMArena Chinese14901421
LMArena French14701417
LMArena German14431457
LMArena Japanese14081416
LMArena Korean14121392
LMArena Russian14501419
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following14141404
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Longer Query14281406
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Text14481417
LMArena Creative Writing14061394
LMArena Multi-Turn14411444
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4.5?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper