Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 50.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1268 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1251 |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1246 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1255 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.