Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Granite 4.1 30B

DeepSeek V4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#28); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.2

Rank #28 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 30B IBM

33.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 4.1 30B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.4 to 21.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Granite 4.1 30B specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index54.233.4
Released2026-04-242026-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked482

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.2 (#31), Granite 4.1 30B: 34.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
SciCode51%25.8%
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
WeirdML66.2%—
LMArena Coding1470—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.7 (#54), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.4 (#22), Granite 4.1 30B: 21.7

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
CritPt18%0%
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1461—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.39—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.6 (#24), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%—
ProofBench50%—
LMArena Math1455—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#28), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
GPQA Diamond91.7%—
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—
LMArena Expert1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.5 (#44), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1486—
LMArena French1473—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1448—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1452—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.3 (#44), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
LMArena Instruction Following1448—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#49), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
CL-bench Life13.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1459—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.6 (#45), Granite 4.1 30B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGranite 4.1 30B
LMArena Text1451—
LMArena Creative Writing1446—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
EQ-Bench 41166—
LMArena Multi-Turn1467—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Granite 4.1 30B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#28); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Granite 4.1 30B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 30B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper