Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Granite 4.1 30B
DeepSeek V4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#28); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 4.1 30B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.4 to 21.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 393K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.2 (#31), Granite 4.1 30B: 34.6
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51% | 25.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1470 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,403 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.7 (#54), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,285 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.4 (#22), Granite 4.1 30B: 21.7
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 18% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 91.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| DTBench | 93.9% | — |
| LMCA | 45.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.39 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.1 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.6 (#24), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#28), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.5 (#44), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena French | 1473 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.3 (#44), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1448 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#49), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1459 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.6 (#45), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1553 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Granite 4.1 30B?
DeepSeek V4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#28); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B better for coding?
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Granite 4.1 30B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 30B has 2.