Model comparison

Granite 4.1 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 30B IBM

34.0

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 30B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 54.0 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B and 59.7% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Granite 4.1 30B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 30B and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Granite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index34.054.8
Released2026-04-292026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 35.2, Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
SciCode25.8%59.7%
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 22.4, Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
CritPt0%26%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1503
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English—1481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text—1490
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 30B better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Granite 4.1 30B or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 30B and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 30B has 2 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper