Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 25.9.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index53.638.8
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14571314
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14441299
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math14271298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert14411289
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14201265
LMArena Chinese14681314
LMArena German14181231
LMArena Japanese14061207
LMArena Russian14281271
LMArena French1439—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14211275

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14341292

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14321299
LMArena Creative Writing14031262
LMArena Multi-Turn14491299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper