Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #33 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 58.8 to 25.9.

Side by side

Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.138.8
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 50.0 (#48), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14911314
DeepSWE46.7%—
FrontierCode34.4%—
LMArena WebDev1538—
SciCode52.7%—
WeirdML56.1%—
ALE-Bench715.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.3 (#65), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
APEX-Agents46.9%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.8 (#22), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14851299
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)89%—
ARC-AGI-191.2%—
CritPt10.6%—
Chess Puzzles43%—
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench95.5%—
LMCA44.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.25—

Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.3 (#40), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math15051298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)58.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions70.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.2%—
ProofBench36%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#8), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert14881289
GPQA Diamond94.1%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.5 (#64), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1298—
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly23.3%—
LMArena Document1456—

Multilingual Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.5 (#19), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14691265
LMArena Chinese15311314
LMArena German14781231
LMArena Japanese14761207
LMArena Russian14871271
LMArena French1504—
LMArena Korean1431—
LMArena Spanish1475—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.0 (#33), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14661275

Long Context Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#50), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14741292

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.2 (#27), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14791299
LMArena Creative Writing14651262
LMArena Multi-Turn14811299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1604—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper