Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Olmo 3 32b Think

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 25.9.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index53.638.7
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14571319
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14441302
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14271316
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14411273
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14201255
LMArena Chinese14681300
LMArena French14391291
LMArena German14181290
LMArena Russian14281254
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14211275

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14341296

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14321300
LMArena Creative Writing14031256
LMArena Multi-Turn14491290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper