Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 60.3 to 46.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 33.6% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 60.3% for Muse Spark 1.2.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-08-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 393K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 41 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | 1533 |
| SciCode | 49.9% | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | 63% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1495 |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 79.2% |
| CritPt | 16.6% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 90.9% | 94.7% |
| LMCA | 41.7% | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.49 | 154.87 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 56% | 43% |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1471 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | — |
Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | 1480 |
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1305 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1439 | 1513 |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | 1487 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | 1498 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | 1461 |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1475 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1494 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 47.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.