Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Glimmer

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 25.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 16.6% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 2.6% for Muse Glimmer.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Muse Glimmer specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index53.641.7
Released2026-04-242026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev15821355
SciCode49.9%44.9%
LMArena Coding14571416
FrontierCode18.8%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
CritPt16.6%2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14441396
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math14271417
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert14411386
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14201384
LMArena Chinese14681412
LMArena Russian14281390
LMArena French1439—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14211375

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14341382

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text14321389
LMArena Creative Writing14031339
LMArena Multi-Turn14491399
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Muse Glimmer?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Muse Glimmer share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper