Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
ProviderDeepSeekBaidu
Noometry Index53.641.8
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4120

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Coding14571455
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%10.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14441445
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Thematic Generalization—41.7%
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Math14271437
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Expert14411428
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Vision—1249

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Non-English14201436
LMArena Chinese14681512
LMArena French14391467
LMArena German14181460
LMArena Japanese14061382
LMArena Korean13841406
LMArena Russian14281446
LMArena Spanish14361473

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14211413

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Longer Query14341422

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Text14321445
LMArena Creative Writing14031426
LMArena Multi-Turn14491434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper