Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 65.4 to 30.4.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index52.831.3
Released2026-09-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Coding15061084
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—
HumanEval+—35.4%
MBPP+—45%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14831071
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math14771107
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert15061039
GPQA Diamond89.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English14481052
LMArena Chinese14971061
LMArena French14521065
LMArena German14841054
LMArena Japanese1412971
LMArena Korean1452988
LMArena Russian14711046
LMArena Spanish14591049

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following14741057

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query14751056

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text14621094
LMArena Creative Writing14351060
LMArena Multi-Turn14571040
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper