Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 29.5.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 52.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.41 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | — |
| LMArena French | 1064 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.