Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
DeepSeek-V3 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3 leads 57.4 to 48.7.
- DeepSeek-V3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 164K | — |
| Max output | 164K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.24 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 42.3 (#106), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1368 | 1307 |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| SciCode | 35.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 36.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 50% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 70.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 62.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 49.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 20.5 (#236), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1365 | 1286 |
| SimpleBench | 27.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 65.8% | — |
| DTBench | 64.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 60.9% | — |
| LMCA | 15.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 87.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.94 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.1 | — |
| HellaSwag | 88.9% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | 84.7% | — |
| WinoGrande | 85.2% | — |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 32.1 (#219), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 37.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 40.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 73.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 75.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge DeepSeek-V3 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 37.5 (#155), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1351 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 67.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 26.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 95.3% | — |
| MMLU | 87.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.9% | — |
Multilingual DeepSeek-V3 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 48.5 (#143), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1358 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1391 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1385 | — |
| LMArena German | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1358 | — |
Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 72.8 (#130), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1345 | 1277 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.5% | — |
| IFEval | 83.2% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 34.0 (#253), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1352 | 1341 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 50% | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3 leads
DeepSeek-V3: 57.4 (#130), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1375 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1364 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1284 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 77% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1472 | — |
| WildBench | 83% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 49.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
DeepSeek-V3 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-V3 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3 has 60 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.