Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Wizardlm 70b
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 20.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Wizardlm 70b?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.