Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 46.0 to 34.1.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index39.733.0
Released2025-12-01—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.58—
Output $ / M tokens$1.68—
Results tracked317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1130

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
SimpleBench52.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1127

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math—1173

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1108

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1094
LMArena Chinese—1108
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Russian—1145
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1113

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1120

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialePhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1138
LMArena Creative Writing—1107
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper