Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 2 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 52.6% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and 22.7% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index39.733.7
Released2025-12-012024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.58—
Output $ / M tokens$1.68—
Results tracked334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
WeirdML46.7%22.2%
LiveBench Coding—46.4%
LMArena Coding—1287

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
SimpleBench52.6%22.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1272
DTBench—65.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.48
LiveBench—54.3%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—11.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
GPQA Diamond—53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%
LMArena Expert—1254

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English—1282
LMArena Chinese—1289
LMArena French—1318
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Russian—1286
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1270

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query—1276

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text—1305
LMArena Creative Writing—1284
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1290
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper