Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
DeepSeek-V3.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 42.2 to 36.3.
- DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 164K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | 1390 |
| WeirdML | 38.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1399 |
| SimpleBench | 40% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| LMCA | 24.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58 | — |
Math Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1414 |
Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1395 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1337 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1405 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1431 | — |
Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 52.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
DeepSeek-V3.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.3 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.