Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

42.6

Rank #96 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 61.3 to 31.2.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index42.631.1
Released2025-09-22—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding14261113
SciCode40.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14271092
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
CritPt1.7%—
DTBench81.3%—
LMCA28.6%—

Math DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math14021143

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1087

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14071037
LMArena Russian14341060
LMArena Chinese—1063

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14061088

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14261122

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text14201096
LMArena Creative Writing14041071
LMArena Multi-Turn14111063

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper