Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Gemma 7B

Gemma 7B has enough public results to be ranked (#295); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

29.5

Rank #295 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 39.8 to 29.9.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemma 7B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index39.729.5
Released2024-05-072024-02-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1048
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—
HumanEval+—28.7%
MBPP+—43.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78111.74
HellaSwag87.1%82.2%
PIQA83.9%81.2%
WinoGrande86.3%79%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1042
Adversarial NLI—48.7%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
LMArena Math—1066
GSM8K—46.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%78.3%
MMLU78.4%66.1%
TriviaQA80%72.3%
LMArena Expert—1002
BoolQ—83.2%
OpenBookQA—78.6%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
LMArena Non-English—999
LMArena Chinese—1035
LMArena French—1024
LMArena Russian—993

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
LMArena Instruction Following—1017

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
LMArena Longer Query—1022

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 7B
LMArena Text—1056
LMArena Creative Writing—1024
LMArena Multi-Turn—963

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Gemma 7B?

Gemma 7B has enough public results to be ranked (#295); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Gemma 7B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemma 7B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper