Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Qwen3-4B

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.0

Rank #197 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 24.5 to 18.5.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3-4B specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.031.5
Released2024-09-062025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.3 (#274), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
LMArena Coding1310—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 24.5 (#145), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1289—

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 33.3 (#177), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
LMArena Math1289—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.2 (#190), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.7 (#188), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena Chinese1317—
LMArena French1288—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Russian1289—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.7 (#189), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1280—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#169), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 50.0 (#182), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-4B
LMArena Text1294—
LMArena Creative Writing1285—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Qwen3-4B?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper