Model comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Mistral Medium 3.1
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 25.6 to 10.6.
- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 17.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 83.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.1% | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1289 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1288 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1266 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1318 | — |
| LMArena French | 1289 | — |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1248 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1280 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1297 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.