Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 34.8 to 19.5.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.632.7
Released2024-09-06—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13091210
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12891208

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12881208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12731160
LMArena Chinese13181192
LMArena Russian12891187
LMArena French1289—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12801186
IFEval—78%

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13011194

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12941218
LMArena Creative Writing12851199
LMArena Multi-Turn12971221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper