Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.9 to 31.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
ProviderDeepSeekXiaomi
Noometry Index37.643.4
Released2024-09-062026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked2223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding13091469
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
ALE-Bench—513.95
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12891450
CritPt—3.7%

Math Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math12881436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert12661460

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English12731404
LMArena Chinese13181468
LMArena French12891447
LMArena German12581421
LMArena Japanese12281306
LMArena Korean12091363
LMArena Russian12891395
LMArena Spanish12481416

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12801434

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query13011445

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text12941428
LMArena Creative Writing12851393
LMArena Multi-Turn12971445

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiMo-V2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper