Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.0

Rank #197 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #83 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 49.5 to 34.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 17.8% for DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and 59.6% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3 235B-A22B specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.043.2
Released2024-09-062025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2249

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.3 (#274), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 43.8 (#72)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
Aider Polyglot17.8%59.6%
LMArena Coding13101445
SciCode—42.4%
WeirdML—41%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.7 (#48)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 24.5 (#145), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.8 (#302)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts12891433
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—69.4%
ARC-AGI-1—11%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—29.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.87
ForecastBench—59.7

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 33.3 (#177), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 48.5 (#51)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Math12891431
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
MATH Level 5—68.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.2 (#190), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.5 (#67)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert12661460
GPQA Diamond—80.1%
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.7 (#188), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.5 (#84)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English12731410
LMArena Chinese13171481
LMArena French12881445
LMArena German12581432
LMArena Japanese12281400
LMArena Korean12091391
LMArena Russian12891411
LMArena Spanish12481429

Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.7 (#189), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.8 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following12801408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#169), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#25)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query13011426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 50.0 (#182), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.8 (#103)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text12941419
LMArena Creative Writing12851384
LMArena Multi-Turn12971432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper