Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.0 to 16.0.
  • DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index26.141.3
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked516

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 21.8 (#336), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
BigCodeBench Instruct7%—
LMArena Coding—1361
BigCodeBench Complete7.9%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 19.2 (#262), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1374

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 23.0 (#274), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202521.4%—
LMArena Math—1359

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 16.0 (#290), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
GPQA Diamond33.6%—
LMArena Expert—1339

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English—1363
LMArena Chinese—1417
LMArena French—1391
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Japanese—1342
LMArena Korean—1351
LMArena Russian—1368

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following—1344

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query—1366

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text—1377
LMArena Creative Writing—1359
LMArena Multi-Turn—1387

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 21.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper