Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.0 to 16.0.
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 26.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 21.8 (#336), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 7.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 19.2 (#262), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 23.0 (#274), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 21.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 16.0 (#290), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 21.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.