Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mistral Nemo
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mistral Nemo?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.