Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 38.4 to 30.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Granite 4.2 8B specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index37.840.5
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—118K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.25
Results tracked1311

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.8 (#202), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
BigCodeBench Instruct35.3%—
LiveBench Coding51.6%—
LMArena Coding—1380
BigCodeBench Complete49.9%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 24.9 (#156), Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning67.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1329
LiveBench Data Analysis55.9%—
LiveBench54.5%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.0 (#176), Granite 4.2 8B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202551.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
MATH Level 589.9%—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 30.7 (#225), Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
GPQA Diamond55.7%—
LMArena Expert—1384

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Non-English—1302
LMArena Chinese—1366
LMArena Russian—1285

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 68.2 (#190), Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
LiveBench Instruction Following69.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1301

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Longer Query—1324

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 49.0 (#194), Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text—1320
LMArena Creative Writing—1236
LMArena Multi-Turn—1301
LiveBench Language23.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B better than Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Granite 4.2 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper