Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 8.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1035 |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1023 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1048 |
Long Context DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.